German Acts  TM-Conqueror  Contact  Imprint  Links

Attorney-at-Law Michael Horak, graduate engineer (Electrical Engineering), LL.M. (European Law)
german-domains-domainlaw-udrp-adr-licence-antitrust-advertising-law-ec-ecj-food-trademark-search 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 Overview  Practice  IP Law  Computer Law  Media Law  Advertising Law  Trademark Applications  Sample Texts  Attorneys Fees  Court Rulings

 

patents-trademarks-copyright-europe

a_beukenberg-rechtsanwalt-schild

ip-attorney-germany

patent-trademark-attorney-at-law

 

 

 

>Start >Overview >Court Rulings >Trademark law >BGH-Blendaxpep
>Start

The judgement of the German Supreme Court – Docket No.: ZB 36/93 – the judgement of the Federal Patent Court of 14th March 1996

Blendax Pep

When evaluating the possibility of confusion within the meaning of § 9 (I) No. 2 of the Trademark Act – according to BGH GRUR 1977, 218 (MERCOL) – it is taken into account that from the point of view of the market in the case of combined signs the manufacturer’s name as part of the product name is not as important as the combined sign.

 

german-trademark-trade-mark-law-patents-utility-models-competition-solicitor-law-firm deutsch english-lawyer-attorney-iplaw-ip-lawyer-it-law-itlawyer english

ip-attorney-ip-lawyer print | trademark-law-patent-domain-design-utility-model-europe save | law-of-technics-multi-media-law-german-business-lawyer back | european-trademark-protection-german-trademarks-european-law enquiry


© 1998-2009 IP Attorney at law Michael Horak· Uhlemeyerstr. 9+11 · 30175 Hannover · Germany
Fon: +49.511.590910.20 · Fax: +49.511.590910.55 · mailto:horak@iprecht.de